Lloyd's List is part of Maritime Intelligence

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited, registered in England and Wales with company number 13831625 and address c/o Hackwood Secretaries Limited, One Silk Street, London EC2Y 8HQ, United Kingdom. Lloyd’s List Intelligence is a trading name of Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited. Lloyd’s is the registered trademark of the Society Incorporated by the Lloyd’s Act 1871 by the name of Lloyd’s.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call UK support at +44 (0)20 3377 3996 / APAC support at +65 6508 2430

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

US port employers respond to ILA’s decision to break off talks

USMX says union ‘is insisting on an agreement that would move our industry backward’

The stalemate in the US east and Gulf coast labour talks continues, and so does the public blame game

EMPLOYERS on US east and Gulf coast ports represented by the US Maritime Alliance (USMX) have responded to the International Longshoremen’s Association decision to break off talks scheduled for this week, arguing the union’s stance on technology will take the industry “backward”.

The ILA and USMX met on Monday for what was supposed to be four days of negotiations, but the union broke off talks on Tuesday, arguing that the USMX “continued pushing automation and semi-automation language” in their contract proposal.

“[The] USMX introduced language in their proposal for semi-automated equipment to be used at ILA ports, which the union outright rejected,” the union said in a statement posted on its Facebook page on Wednesday.

The employers responded later that day, arguing that the ILA “is insisting on an agreement that would move our industry backward by restricting future use of technology that has existed in some of our ports for nearly two decades — making it impossible to evolve to meet the nation’s future supply chain demands”.

“The USMX has been clear that we are not seeking technology that would eliminate jobs,” the employers said.

The parties “had positive progress on a number of issues” but they were “unable to make significant progress on our discussions that focused on a range of technology issues”.

The development, while perhaps unsurprising, further raises the threat of more disruption in US ports from Maine to Texas in January.

The ILA went on strike on October 1, but a temporary resolution was reached three days later. The parties tentatively agreed to a 61.5% pay hike over the new contract’s duration, and to extend the current contract until January 15, giving them three more months to reach a deal.

However, the resolution was reached following political intervention from the White House, which sought to avoid or limit economic disruption just weeks before the US presidential election.

Now that the election is over, there likely won’t be the same pressure from the Biden administration to reach a deal by the January 15 deadline, which is just five days before Donald Trump will begin his second term.

Download the Lloyd’s List App — the essential tool for staying ahead in the maritime industry, anytime, anywhere! Available now on the App Store and Google Play. More information here

Related Content

Topics

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

LL1151431

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel